🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump had a cautionary message for Democrats.

Soon he will decide what "Democrat agencies" he would reduce and whether those reductions would be short-term or permanent.

He said the federal closure, which began on Tuesday, had given him an "unprecedented opportunity."

"I have a meeting today with Russ Vought, he of PROJECT 2025 Fame," he wrote on his Truth Social website on Thursday.

Linking to the 2025 Plan

Vought, the head of the federal budget office, may not be a household name.

But the 2025 initiative, a right-wing plan for administration put together mostly by previous administration figures like Vought when the GOP was not in control, featured prominently during the recent election cycle.

The 900-page policy document contained proposals for significant cuts in the federal bureaucracy, increased executive power, rigorous immigration enforcement, a national prohibition on abortion and other components of an ultra-conservative social agenda.

It was frequently touted by Democratic presidential nominee the former vice president, as what she called a risky proposal for the future if he was to win.

At the time, seeking to reassure undecided voters, the president attempted to separate himself from the proposal.

"I know nothing about Project 2025," the president stated in mid-2024. "I disagree with some of the things they're saying and some of the things they're saying are absolutely ridiculous and abysmal."

Shifting Approach

Now, however, Trump is using the conservative blueprint as leverage to get Democrats to accept his spending requirements.

And he is holding up Vought, who wrote a section on the use of executive power, as a kind of financial grim reaper, ready to take a scythe to government programmes near and dear to the opposition party.

To make the point even clearer, on Thursday evening the president posted an computer-created spoof video on Truth Social with the director depicted as the figure of death, accompanied by changed words of the rock band's classic song.

Washington Responses

In Congress, Republican leaders have repeated the president's description of the director as the White House heavy.

"We have no say over what he's going to do," GOP Senate leader the senator said. "This represents the danger of shutting down the government and transferring control to Russ Vought."

Senator Mike Lee of Utah told the news network that the director had been "preparing for this moment since puberty."

This might be a bit of an overstatement, but the director, who gained experience as a congressional staffer for GOP fiscal conservatives and assisted in managing the lobbying arm of the conservative think tank, has a wealth of experience digging through the intricacies of the federal budget.

The Bean-Counter Behind the President

He spent a year as the deputy director of the White House budget office during the initial administration, rising to be its director in 2019.

Unlike many who worked for the president during those first four years, Vought had staying power - and was promptly reappointed as director of OMB when Trump returned recently.

"A lot of those who didn't come back represent an old way of thinking," said a policy expert, a Heritage economic policy director who, similar to the director, started his professional life in conservative congressional budget circles.

"Russ was ahead of his time in the first term and perfectly positioned now."

While the director doesn't tend to shy away from divisive comments – he once said that he aspired to be "the person who crushes the deep state" – he doesn't exactly look the part of a Republican bogeyman.

Thinning hair and wearing glasses, with a greying beard, the director's remarks typically have the controlled rhythm of a numbers expert or academic.

He doesn't possess the intense stare and heated language of another advisor, a different presidential consultant who oversees White House immigration policy.

Seizing Opportunity in Shutdown

Now Trump has threatened to unleash Vought at a moment when, because of the legal limbo caused by the government shutdown, their reductions could become deeper and more durable than those instituted earlier this year.

Ex-congressional leader Newt Gingrich, a veteran of the big shutdown fights of the nineties, told the media outlet that the director and his staff have been getting ready for precisely this situation while they were in the opposition period during the previous administration.

"Everyone understood a federal closure was likely," he said. "I believe they concluded early on that you're only going to get the scale of change they want if you're very tough and resolute and whenever possible, you seize the moment."

The advantage the closure offers for spending reducers like Vought is that, lacking legislative authorization, the federal operations continue in a legal grey area with fewer budgetary restrictions.

The White House can, in theory, cut budgets and personnel deeper than it could previously, when expenditures followed baseline appropriation amounts.

And while permanent layoffs would still have to abide by a two-month warning, Vought could start the countdown when he, and Trump, decide to.

Present Measures and Coming Conflicts

The director has declared significant construction initiatives in the largest city and the midwestern metropolis are paused, citing the need for a examination of potentially illegal racial hiring practices - a review that he said cannot occur during the closure.

He's also terminated almost eight billion dollars in renewable energy initiatives across multiple states, each supporting the Democratic candidate, Trump's opponent, in the recent election.

Democrats and federal worker unions have vowed to challenge these reductions in the legal system and claimed that the president is issuing largely empty threats to try to pressure them into giving up their opposition.

Numerous financial experts have noted that the administration cutbacks have been paired with other spending-increasing measures, which could weaken their criticism on Democrats for being the party of fiscal irresponsibility.

"Republicans are increasing spending in different sectors and reducing revenue at the identical period," an economics professor, an economics professor at the prestigious institution commented.

"The idea that they're committed to financial responsibility is not supported by what they're doing."

Electoral Dangers

Some Republicans in Congress have expressed concern that the visible enthusiasm with which Trump is touting Vought-ordered cuts could alienate voters if the closure continues.

GOP officials have cautioned of the dire consequences of the closure on public operations - part of a concerted effort to depict the opposition as the ones to blame.

Doing so while applauding the methods the administration is slashing programmes could undermine that approach.

"The director is less politically aware than the president," South Dakota Senator Kevin Cramer, a participant in the efficiency group, told the news website Semafor.

"We, as Republicans have never had so much ethical advantage on a spending measure in our lives… I don't understand why we would waste it, which I think is the risk of being aggressive with executive power in this moment."

The North Carolina senator, a legislator who has chosen not to run for another term, cautions that government representatives "need to be really careful" in how they announce additional reductions.

The Doge-directed layoffs and programme cuts were mostly disliked, according to polling data, causing a drag on the president's approval ratings.

A repetition of this could be risky.

As the expert stated, however, the White House, and the director, may consider the future advantages as worth the immediate difficulties.

"For the director, for me, for anybody who's in the budget space, the nation faces financial crisis,"