🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an international accord created to protect females from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters assembled in the capital this week to oppose the decision. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Known as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, mandating governments to develop legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all types of violence.

Latvia has become the first EU country to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in 2021, a move that rights groups described as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was ratified by the EU in 2023, yet traditionalist factions have contended that its focus on equal rights weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to exit from the treaty, a move sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three governing partners.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader Evika Silina, who joined protesters outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's ombudswoman the rights official urged the treaty not to be made political, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a threat to national principles, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The recent decision has sparked broad protest both within the country and internationally.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal demanding the convention to be maintained. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for next Thursday, accusing lawmakers of ignoring the wishes of the nation's citizens.

International Concerns and Potential Future Actions

The leader of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that the Baltic state had made a hasty decision fueled by misinformation. He described it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He added that since the transcontinental nation left the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had increased significantly.

Because the decision did not achieve a two-thirds support, the head of state could potentially return the bill for further review if he holds concerns.

Head of State the national leader announced on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the Progressives, indicated it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome development for gender equality not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," commented a human rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries